|
Are We Saved by Faith Alone?
 Today’s Question:
I recently was handed a copy of the Summer '98 Good News El Paso, and read your
article ‘Do you hate Catholics?’ I agree with you, in terms of your statement,
"I don't think that love should force me to keep quiet when I disagree with others".
Your statement "Martin Luther, though not perfect, was
not a ‘Judas Iscariot’". He did, however, make a
solemn vow before God (upon entering the priesthood) then
abandoned that vow. We can then certainly see from Sacred
Scripture that Judas Iscariot did abandon any vows he made when
he betrayed Christ! So, in a sense, Martin Luther does share
certain similarities with Mr. Iscariot!
Faith without works is dead, now isn't it? Did you know
that Martin Luther wanted to throw out the epistle of James, as
well as the book of Revelation, when he ‘recomposed’
the Bible?
Gerry, a devoted Catholic
Bible Answer: You said
that Martin Luther "shared certain similarities with Mr.
Iscariot" because he abandoned his vows as a Catholic Monk.
I don’t think it’s right to infer that because he
renounced his vow as a monk that puts him in the same category
with Judas Iscariot, who betrayed Christ.
For example, does this mean if a Mormon who made a vow in the
Mormon Temple wanted to be a Catholic that you would want him to
remain in Mormonism because he made a solemn vow? I think you can
see the fallacy of your argument. When a person sees that he made
a vow to an apostate religion then he must repent and get out of
his vow. I think this is what Martin Luther believed.
Now concerning Martin Luther’s teaching on salvation by
faith alone and his initial rejection of the book of James: As
you know it is true that Luther felt that James differed with
Paul’s teaching on salvation by grace through faith. As a
result he held suspect, the book of James, but later realized
that James did not contradict Paul’s teaching, but simply
put emphases on the need for faith to work. Thus was born
Luther’s famous statement, "We are saved by faith
alone, but faith is never alone."
This might surprise you, Gerry, but I don’t agree with
Luther’s statement. The reason is simple, if faith is
"never alone" then we are not saved by "faith
alone." Luther played semantics.
Not only was Luther wrong because the statement contradicts
itself, but it also contradicts the Bible:
You see that a person is justified by what he does and
not by faith alone. (James 2:24)
So you can see clearly that a person is not justified by
faith alone.
I think because most Protestants want to affirm salvation by
"faith alone" that Protestantism has suffered morally.
(By the way, I don’t consider myself a Protestant or a Roman
Catholic, but simply a Christian.)
Through this dogma of salvation by faith alone many professing
Christians believe they are saved even though their conduct says
something else. As a result, I believe we will see many
professing believers cast into hell. As Jesus said,
Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’
will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the
will of my Father who is in heaven. (Matt. 7:21)
Profession is not enough, action is also required to enter the
kingdom of heaven.
Someone might argue, "Are you teaching salvation through
works?"
It depends what kind of works you are talking about. If you
are referring to the "works of the Law" then definitely
not, but if you are referring to the "works of faith"
then definitely so.
Paul writes in Ephesians 2:8-9:
For it is by grace you have been saved through
faith—and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of
God—not by works so that no one can boast.
Most people stop reading right there, so they assume the "works" Paul was
referring to was "good works" which accompany your faith, but that is not the
kind of works Paul had in mind; we know this because he continues
in the next verse,
For we are God’s workmanship, created in Christ
Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us
to do. (v 10)
Notice the difference between the works that can’t
save you in verse nine, and the good works that we in
Christ do in verse ten. When Paul mentioned the works that
can’t save you he was referring to the works of the Law.
For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart
from observing the law. (Rom 3:28)
Observing the law was the "works" that
can’t save you. Observing the law is not the same as good
works. This is where many make the mistake. They put
"good works" under the category of the "works of
the Law." But good works must accompany your faith or you
really do not have faith.
You see, the nature of true faith is action. For someone to
claim faith, yet act the opposite proves the person’s claim
to faith is not real. This is what James understood.
For example, if you were married to Clinton Jr., and said to
him, "I trust you", then you go out and hire a private
investigator to follow him, then do you really trust him? No.
Your action proved that your claim to faith is a fallacy. You
really don’t have faith.
There is no such thing as faith without corresponding action.
Faith must act, or it isn’t faith. So we are not saved by
faith alone, because faith is never alone.
I think a better way to state how we are saved is this: We
are saved by grace alone, through faith that works. Notice
where I placed the word "alone." I placed it along with
grace. Grace is free, so no one can earn it. As Paul writes:
And if by grace, then it is no longer by works; if it
were, grace would no longer be grace. (Rom 11:6)
It is grace alone that saves, and the means to this grace is
faith that works.
So if we claim to have faith in Christ, then we must act like
it.
 Send
your comments
Read more Bible Answers to Today's
Questions
Click
here if you're interested in having Tom
Brown come to your area
Back to the Main Page
|
