Are We Saved by Faith Alone?
I recently was handed a copy of the Summer '98 Good News El Paso, and read your
article ‘Do you hate Catholics?’ I agree with you, in terms of your statement,
"I don't think that love should force me to keep quiet when I disagree with others".
Your statement "Martin Luther, though not perfect, was
not a Judas Iscariot". He did, however, make a
solemn vow before God (upon entering the priesthood) then
abandoned that vow. We can then certainly see from Sacred
Scripture that Judas Iscariot did abandon any vows he made when
he betrayed Christ! So, in a sense, Martin Luther does share
certain similarities with Mr. Iscariot!
Faith without works is dead, now isn't it? Did you know
that Martin Luther wanted to throw out the epistle of James, as
well as the book of Revelation, when he recomposed
Gerry, a devoted Catholic
Bible Answer: You said
that Martin Luther "shared certain similarities with Mr.
Iscariot" because he abandoned his vows as a Catholic Monk.
I dont think its right to infer that because he
renounced his vow as a monk that puts him in the same category
with Judas Iscariot, who betrayed Christ.
For example, does this mean if a Mormon who made a vow in the
Mormon Temple wanted to be a Catholic that you would want him to
remain in Mormonism because he made a solemn vow? I think you can
see the fallacy of your argument. When a person sees that he made
a vow to an apostate religion then he must repent and get out of
his vow. I think this is what Martin Luther believed.
Now concerning Martin Luthers teaching on salvation by
faith alone and his initial rejection of the book of James: As
you know it is true that Luther felt that James differed with
Pauls teaching on salvation by grace through faith. As a
result he held suspect, the book of James, but later realized
that James did not contradict Pauls teaching, but simply
put emphases on the need for faith to work. Thus was born
Luthers famous statement, "We are saved by faith
alone, but faith is never alone."
This might surprise you, Gerry, but I dont agree with
Luthers statement. The reason is simple, if faith is
"never alone" then we are not saved by "faith
alone." Luther played semantics.
Not only was Luther wrong because the statement contradicts
itself, but it also contradicts the Bible: "You see that a person is justified by what he does and
not by faith alone" (James 2:24).
So you can see clearly that a person is not justified
by "faith alone".
I think because most Protestants want to affirm salvation by
"faith alone" that Protestantism has suffered morally.
(By the way, I dont consider myself a Protestant or a Roman
Catholic, but simply a Christian.)
Through this dogma of salvation by faith alone many professing
Christians believe they are saved even though their conduct says
something else. As a result, I believe we will see many
professing believers cast into hell. As Jesus said, "Not everyone who says to me, Lord, Lord,
will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the
will of my Father who is in heaven" (Matt. 7:21).
Profession is not enough, action is also required to enter the
kingdom of heaven.
Someone might argue, "Are you teaching salvation through
works?" Not when you understand that good works come from a salvation
Paul writes in Ephesians 2:8-9:
"For it is by grace you have been saved through
faithand this not from yourselves, it is the gift of
Godnot by works so that no one can boast." So salvation is not by
any human works. Most people stop reading right there, so they assume the "works" Paul was
referring to was "good works" which accompany your faith, but that is not the
kind of works Paul had in mind; we know this because he continues
in the next verse, "For we are Gods workmanship, created in Christ
Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us
to do" (v 10).
Notice the difference between the
"works" that cant
save you in verse nine, and the "good works" that we do in
Christ. When Paul mentioned the works that
cant save you he was referring to the works of the Law. "For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart
from observing the law" (Rom 3:28).
"Observing the law" was the "works" that
cant save you. "Observing the law" is not the same as
works". This is where many make the mistake. They put
"good works" under the category of the "works of
the Law." But good works must accompany your faith or you
really do not have faith.
You see, the nature of true faith is action. For someone to
claim faith, yet act the opposite proves the persons claim
to faith is not real. This is what James understood. Faith by nature acts. For
example, you drive through a green light because you trust the other cars to
stop at their red light. Faith, in other words, is not really passive but
active. When you understand faith in these terms, you realize that James was
referring to the natural aspect of faith--that is it acts.
Yet, it is possible to treat
faith like a life insurance. You buy the insurance, but after that, it does not
change your lifestyle. Some accept Christ and get baptized because they want to
ensure that they will make heaven. Like insurance, they see salvation as only
relevant upon their death. But James teaches that faith in Christ changes a
person's life in the now.
There is no such thing as faith without corresponding action.
Faith must act, or it isnt faith. So we are not saved by
faith alone, because faith is never alone.
I think a better way to state how we are saved is this: We
are saved by grace alone, through faith that works. Notice
where I placed the word "alone." I placed it along with
grace. Grace is free, so no one can earn it. As Paul writes: "And if by grace, then it is no longer by works; if it
were, grace would no longer be grace" (Rom 11:6).
It is grace alone that saves, and the means to this grace is
faith that works. So if we claim to have faith in Christ, then we must act like
Finally, it should be noted that
in 1999 the Roman Catholic Church signed an agreement with the Lutheran Church
on the doctrine of Justification. The
joint statement says this:
"Together we confess: By grace alone, in faith in Christ's saving work and
not because of any merit on our part, we are accepted by God and receive the
Holy Spirit, who renews our hearts while equipping and calling us to good
Luther may not have seen the fruit of his work, but the Catholic Church has come
around to understand that salvation is by grace alone. And hopefully Protestants
can come around to see the importance of good works after salvation, produced by
the inward work of the Holy Spirit. As the statement says, God does not simply
call us to good works but "equips" us to good works. In that sense, faith
without works is indeed dead. But works without saving faith is double-dead; it
deceives us into thinking we are saved because of the good works we have done. We
should rest in the saving work of Christ on the cross and allow the Holy Spirit
to continue His work in bearing fruit.
Read more Bible Answers to Today's
here if you're interested in having Tom
Brown come to your area
Back to the Main Page